CFG
09/05 rev.
Letter to Ms. Jennifer
Prescott, Veterinary Medicines Directorate on 5th May 2005
Foodaware members welcome the streamlining of the UK legislation,
its incorporation of the EU requirements and the attempts to clarify
and simplify it in line with the principles of good regulation. As
the streamlined regulations run to 115 pages, and the total consultation
to significantly more than that, we comment only in general terms.
Advertising
In line with other advertising legislation, the Regulations require
that advertisements must not be misleading and that any claims must
be included in the product characteristics. We particularly welcome
the ban on advertising prescription only medicines to the general
public, but consider it important that they be given sufficient information
with any medication intended for domestic animals and pets to treat
them appropriately.
Food producing Animals
Regulation 8.2 makes it an offence to administer a veterinary medicinal
product to a food producing animal unless it is prescribed in accordance
with Schedule 3 or administered in accordance with Schedule 4. We
support the requirement that all products for food producing animals
should be classified as POM-V or POM-VPM so that they are subject
to veterinary control. It will be important for vets and other suppliers,
farm assurance inspectors and enforcement authorities to check that
any medication prescribed for food producing animals is used in
accordance with the data sheet, recorded in the farm records and
that relevant withdrawal periods are complied with. On farm record-keeping
has not in the past been adequate. We would like the VMD to liaise
with Defra and the Food Standards Agency once the new regulations
are in place, to ensure that new arrangements are implemented and
that there is sufficient emphasis on enforcement of the new regime.
Classification
We note the VMD’s intention to reclassify medicines to make
clear which may be prescribed only by vets; those which will be
available from vets, pharmacists and merchants for the wholesale
trade and those which will be permitted on general sale. Recognising
that there are increasing numbers of para-professionals and veterinary
nurses working in veterinary teams and as part of the supply chain,
Foodaware members consider that the definition of Suitably Qualified
Professionals should be wide enough to encompass veterinary nurses.
This should help to keep the costs of medication down, while allowing
different types of medicine to be administered by appropriately
qualified personnel.
Members are particularly interested in how currently authorised
medicines will be reclassified and wish to ensure that there will
be sufficient consultation on this work as it progresses. We are
concerned that there should be no weakening of existing controls
on active ingredients and that the safety assessments are robust.
It is important that the arrangements for fast-tracking amendments
to existing data sheets should not be used to lessen public protections
and that the level of scrutiny is adequate to protect users and
their animals, as well as the wider public.
There is particular concern about the classification of antibiotics
because of the growing problem of resistance in bacteria, animals
and humans. In human medicine controls on excess use are to some
extent achieved through the use of prescriptions issued by doctors
and supply through pharmacies. Veterinarians are both prescribing
and supplying these products (an indeed other medicines) and there
is potential commercial pressure to oversupply. Members consider
that the use of antibiotics in animals should be reduced as far
as possible and the level of use by individual suppliers should
be monitored.
Internet sales of medicines including veterinary medicines should
be brought within the scope of the reclassification exercise. Members
of Foodaware recognise the difficulties in controlling such sales,
but are concerned about the potential for abuse in this area.
Specialist Producers
The high profile campaign by bee-keepers to be allowed to prescribe
relevant treatments without any supervision and involvement by vets
(who may not have a specialist knowledge of bee diseases) reflects
their economic concerns. Whatever solution is found to sustain the
health of the bee population in the UK, it must not be at the expense
of food safety and the quality of the final product. Veterinary
and other residues have been found in honey in the past. The use
of medication, which can leave unacceptable residues in a food often
marketed for its health giving properties, is a problem and needs
control.
Foodaware is content for this response to be made publicly available.
Susan Knox
Chairperson
 |