Home page
 
 
 
Food Standards Agency Guidance on Clear Labelling

CFG 42/07
final


Letter dated 21 December 2007 from Foodaware to Janet McKenzie, Food Labelling and Marketing Terms Branch, Food Standards Agency:

Dear Ms McKenzie

Food Standards Agency Guidance on Clear Labelling

Foodaware Members discussed this revised Guidance at their December meeting. We note that although FSA is specifically consulting about the use of the Guidance in England, parallel consultations are occurring in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Members feel strongly that this guidance should apply throughout the UK so that the Agency is promoting a consistent approach despite the voluntary nature of the Guidance itself.

Members welcome the clear presentation in the document and particularly appreciate the way the document recognises the importance of taking account of the interests of partially sighted people. The inclusion of pictures and visual material is valued as are the examples of good practice. Members mentioned that the use of colour to highlight important aspects on food labels can also be helpful to young children and those who may have learning difficulties. The traffic lights for nutritional labelling have been particularly valuable in this regard, allowing young children to begin to discriminate between products on the basis of their nutritional composition without needing to understand percentage declarations.

It is disappointing that FSA research has shown that 89% of products surveyed did not comply with the recommended minimum font size especially in view of the ageing population and issues facing those who lack good eyesight. It seems like a retrograde step for FSA to have to underline in voluntary guidance the importance of the minimum font size for mandatory information. In general, members consider the Guidance should follow key principles such as clarity, legibility, contrast, and use of colour and pictures rather than details of fonts which are considered appropriate.

Ultimately, whether labelling is clear depends on the understanding of the customer. Perhaps FSA should consider doing more customer surveys in this area and consider ‘naming and shaming’ those whose labelling is unclear.

Yours sincerely


Susan Knox
Chairman

Top of page