Home page
 
 
 
New legislation on gm labelling - 2002

New legislation on gm labelling

Labelling requirements for GMOs in food and feed were agreed by the Council at the end of November 2002 and on traceability in December 2002. All genetically modified feed will be labelled and current labelling requirements for genetically modified food will be extended to cover food in which no dna remains such as highly refined soya and maize products.

The agreement introduces for the first time strict labelling requirements of GM-feed along the same principle as for GM food. Currently no labelling requirements are in place for feed produced from GMOs. The proposal will require labelling of, for example, GM-soy meal and any compound feed that includes in its composition the GM-soya meal. It will also require labelling of corn gluten feed produced from GM maize.

However, food from animals fed on GM feed, eggs, milk and eggs for example, will not have to be labelled.

When operators, throughout the production and distribution chains, are handling products that contain GMOs they will have to provide this information to the next operator in the chain providing for traceability.

Operators will have to list the codes for individual GMOs, in accompanying documentation, that have been used to constitute the original raw material for products intended for food, feed and processing.

Threshold for labelling

Under current legislation the presence of GM material in conventional food does not have to be labelled if it is below 1% and if it can be shown to be adventitious and technically unavoidable. The Council agreed on a threshold of no higher than 0.9%.

Under current legislation, there is no tolerance threshold for the adventitious presence of GM material in food or feed which has not been authorised. The Commission had proposed a 1% threshold for the adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of such GM material, provided that the GM material has received a favourable EU scientific risk assessment and that the operator can demonstrate that its presence was technically unavoidable. Above this threshold the product will not be allowed on the market.

The Council decided to set the threshold at 0.5% and to limit its application to 3 years. The Commission would however review the operation of this clause and make a proposal for its extension if appropriate.
Top of page